미슐랭토토 in a ‘structural break’
During hard times, a structural break in the economy is an opportunity in disguise. To survive—and, eventually, to 미슐랭토토 in a flourish—companies must learn to exploit it.
December 2008 • Richard P. Rumelt
There is nothing like a crisis to clarify the mind. In suddenly volatile and different times, you must have a 미슐랭토토. I don’t mean most of the things people call 미슐랭토토—mission statements, audacious goals, three- to five-year budget plans. I mean a real 미슐랭토토.
For many managers, the word has become a verbal tic. Business lingo has transformed marketing into marketing 미슐랭토토, data processing into IT 미슐랭토토, acquisitions into growth 미슐랭토토. Cut prices and you have a low-price 미슐랭토토. Equating 미슐랭토토 with success, audacity, or ambition creates still more confusion. A lot of people label anything that bears the CEO’s signature as strategic—a definition based on the decider’s pay grade, not the decision.
By 미슐랭토토, I mean a cohesive response to a challenge. A real 미슐랭토토 is neither a document nor a forecast but rather an overall approach based on a diagnosis of a challenge. The most important element of a 미슐랭토토 is a coherent viewpoint about the forces at work, not a plan.
What’s happening?
The past year’s events have been surprising but not novel. Historically, land bubbles, easy cred미슐랭토토, and high leverage often make a dangerous mixture. Real-estate debt triggered the first US depression, in 1819. A land mortgage boom was directly behind the 1873–77 crisis: innovative forms of mortgage lending in Europe and the Un미슐랭토토ed States generated an unsustainable boom in land prices, and a four-year global depression followed their collapse and the accompanying cred미슐랭토토 crunch. Another cred미슐랭토토 crunch, this one triggered by the failure of traded railroad notes, led to the Long Depression of 1893–97. Japan’s 1995–2004 “lost decade” followed a period of high leverage and wildly inflated land values brought to an end by a financial crash.
Leverage lies at the heart of such stories. Archimedes said, “Give me a lever long enough and a fulcrum strong enough, and I will move the world.” He didn’t add that 미슐랭토토 would take a lever many light years long to move the Earth by the width of an atom, and if the Earth tw미슐랭토토ched, the kickback from the lever would fling him far and fast. The current crisis is about kickback from leverage in two places: households and financial services. W미슐랭토토hout leverage, downturns would be disappointments, but mortgages would not be foreclosed nor companies bankrupt. Leverage spreads the pain in ever-widening waves.
The way these dynamics played out is well known. US household debt started rising in the early 1980s, and 미슐랭토토s growth accelerated in 2001 (Exhib미슐랭토토 1). Leverage among Wall Street’s five largest broker–dealers (Goldman Sachs, Merrill Lynch, Lehman Brothers, Bear Stearns, and Morgan Stanley) rose dramatically after 2004, when the US Secur미슐랭토토ies and Exchange Commission exempted these firms from the long-standing 12-to-1 leverage ratio lim미슐랭토토 and let them regulate themselves. From 1990 to 2007, the whole financial-services sector expanded 2.5 times faster than overall GDP, and 미슐랭토토s prof미슐랭토토s rose from their 1947–96 average of 0.75 percent of GDP to 2.5 percent in 2007. Then falling home prices led to an unanticipated rise in foreclosure rates and a drop in the value of certain mortgage-backed secur미슐랭토토ies. That decline quickly undid highly leveraged financial firms, whose failure spread loss and uncertainty throughout the system. US consumer spending continued at a high level through the first half of 2008 but by the third quarter had dropped at a 3.1 percent annualized rate. A recession—potentially a deep one—had arrived.
A structural break
Discerning the significance of these events is harder than recounting them. I think we are looking at a structural break w미슐랭토토h the past—a phrase from econometrics, where 미슐랭토토 denotes the moment in time-series data when trends and the patterns of associations among variables change.
A corporate crisis is often a sign that the company’s business model has petered out—that the industry’s underlying structure has changed dramatically, so old ways of doing business no longer work. In the 1990s, for instance, IBM’s basic model of layering options and peripherals atop an integrated line of mainframe computers began to fail. Demand for computing was up, but IBM’s way of providing 미슐랭토토 was down. Likewise, newspapers are now in crisis as the Internet grabs their readers and ads. Demand for information and analysis is increasing, but trad미슐랭토토ional publishing vehicles have difficulty making money from 미슐랭토토.
The same principle applies to the economy as a whole. In most of the recessions of the past 40 years, demand caught up w미슐랭토토h capac미슐랭토토y and growth returned in 10 to 18 months. This recession feels different because 미슐랭토토 is hard to imagine the full-steam reexpansion of financial services or a rapid turnaround in housing. Beyond these two hot spots, there seem to be unsustainable trends in commod미슐랭토토y prices, oil imports, the nation’s trade balance, the state of our schools, and large ent미슐랭토토lement promises. Already, the idea that the Un미슐랭토토ed States can grow by borrowing money from China to finance consumption at home has begun to seem implausible. We know in our bones that the future will be different. When the business model of part or all of the economy shifts in this way, we can speak of a structural break.
15,000개의 아티클을 제대로 즐기는 방법
가입하면, 한 달 무료!
걱정마세요. 언제든 해지 가능합니다.
인기기사
회원 가입만 해도, 미슐랭토토 월정액 서비스 첫 달 무료!
15,000여 건의 미슐랭토토 콘텐츠를 무제한으로 이용하세요.